Showing posts with label use. Show all posts
Showing posts with label use. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 26, 2018

What are the big price domains doing today?

I decided to take a a look at the domain names in the top 20 positions of the NameBio all-time sales list. Collectively these 20 sales (across 19 different domain names, since one sold twice) represent investments in digital assets of more than $140 million.  I looked at whether the name currently leads to a  developed website, and if that site employs a SSL certificate. The data is pictured in the table below (click on the image for a higher resolution view).


Summary


  1. All 20 sales were in the .com extension. 
  2. The prices range from $3.6 million to $14 million per domain name. The total of the 20 sales is just over $14 million.
  3. All but four transactions were private sales. Moniker had two of the sales and Sedo one.
  4. Most of the sales were years ago, the most recent in 2016. 14 were in 2010 or earlier.
  5. As of today, one is listed for sale, three are used for redirection, one shows a 'coming soon' lander, one is a legacy page for a company that went out of business,  two others are not in use, and 12 of the names have developed content.
  6. It would appear that none are directly used for websites that make the main most popular lists. For example none are on the Moz Top 500 sites (Facebook is on the list, but not as FB).
  7. Four of the top five sales lead to adult websites. These are designated by a !! warning in the table and should only be accessed by those 18 and over.
  8. All but two of the active websites go to English language sites.
  9. The types of names on list: 1 single letter, 6 double letter, one four word name (AsSeenOnTV) and the rest are single word. 
  10. To protect users from possible harm, Google Chrome flags websites that do not use SSL certificates.  Only 11 of the sites have SSL certificates operational at the time I checked. 

Discussion


Possibly the most surprising result was that so many of the names lead to sites that are not SSL secure.  At a cost of the order of $20 per year for an SSL certificate you can perhaps see a blogger who is making pennies per day delaying implementation, but it seems hard to see why a digital asset worth millions should not have this feature.

When I look at the most popular websites and compare them to a list of the highest value sales, even going further than the top 20 covered in detail here, it seems that there is a definite mismatch between which domain names are used for sites that get the most web traffic and which sold for the highest prices.  Com is dominant in both lists, but much more so in sales prices than in lists of popular websites.

Others have commented that the huge sale prices were predominantly in the decade from 2000 to 2010.  While I did not do a rigorous analysis for more recent periods, such as the top sales 2018 YTD, the sales are still .com dominated although two new extensions makes the top 20 positions on that list.  The type of domain seems even more single word dominated in recent top sales, and the predominance of private sales is far less evident.


Links:


Original post Sept 26, 2018.


Fine Print

This post is offered for informational and educational purposes only, and should not be considered domain name investment advice. While an attempt has been made to be accurate, there is no implied or explicit warranty, and you are responsible for verifying any information of importance to you. You also accept full responsibility for any domain investing decisions you may make.

I try to be fair, balanced and objective in my analysis.  If you feel this post does not meet that standard, please express your concerns to me. 

In a very few cases there may be affiliate links on this blog. This means I receive a small amount if users visit or make purchases via the link. You do not pay any additional charge due to using an affiliate link, and in some cases your cost will be below the normal price. I receive no identifying information about who clicks, or does not click, any link. I never accept compensation to provide favourable review of any particular service or product.

The text of this posting is ©R Hawkes, all rights reserved. However, you may, without permission, use reasonable length portions of the post as long as a link to this post is also provided. If you wish to use the complete contents of a post, please request permission. I am normally open to reprinting, but will consider each request individually. 




Saturday, September 22, 2018

New Extensions at Tech Giants

This week Apple used their corporate .apple new domain extension in promotion of their new iPhone models. This got a lot of attention in both the technology and domain communities. I think the real excitement should focus on the fact that they used a domain name phrase, and not simply on the use of a branded new extension.  I will expand on that idea in a future post.

It is sometimes overlooked that the biggest technology companies, not surprisingly, have been using new domain extensions in a variety of ways for some time. In this post I look at new domain extension use by Apple, Amazon,  Google, Facebook and Netflix. I think there are some lessons for both marketing professionals and domain investors in these examples.

Apple


Apple of course has its own  branded .apple new extension.  While Experience.Apple is only the second meaningful use of the branded extension yet, clearly it has great potential for all manner of catchy domain name phrases. There are endless two or three word phrases such as create.with.apple to simply.apple that are possible.

But Apple has also for some time used many other new domain extensions.  A number of these were for simple redirection,  for example Apple.site, Apple.website and Apple.xyz all redirect to the main site.  A few other new extensions are used by Apple  in a more targeted way such as Apple.news (that not surprisingly goes to their corporate news site) and Apple.technology that takes you to their developer resources.


Amazon


Amazon use a huge number of different new extensions, and I just touch on a few of them in this section.  It is actually a lot of fun trying different  ngTLDs with the word Amazon! A number of new extensions including .fit, .forsale, .guide, .life, .online,  .rocks, .site, .space, .world, .xyz and many more just direct you to the main Amazon website.  Amazon also use redirects to their main website for extensions such as .date, .fund, .loan, .loans and .science where the fit is arguably more contrived. They are missing some obvious ones, since .fun, .life and .icu don't resolve so supposedly are not at time of writing controlled by Amazon.

However, Amazon also makes more specific, and interesting, use of some of the other new extensions. Amazon.dog takes you to a page with everything from dog treats to dog beds to books about dogs. Amazon.Christmas, as you guessed, highlights Christmas crafts and decorations. They naturally use the .boats extension for all your boating needs. Amazon do make use of the .lgbt extension, but not in an apparent way to highlight resources for the LGBT community. Amazon.today takes you to today's deals. You might wonder what Amazon.horse takes you to - try it! Wonder where they would take you at the .wtf extension? Try it to find out!

Unlike Apple, Google and Netflix, Amazon does not yet have their own branded .amazon ngTLD, although they have been battling for years to secure it.  They are currently trying to placate objections from those  associated with the Amazon region of the world. You can read about some of the twists and turns in that here.


Google


It is well known that Alphabet,  the parent company of Google, use the new extension domain name abc.xyz for their corporate website.

Google also own the rights to a number of different extensions, and of course had the very successful .app extension release earlier this year.  The other active extensions in general availability that they operate are much less well known, extensions such as .soy.  They have also for some time operated an internationalized character domain extension that in the Japanese language means 'everyone'.  Several of the extensions they have that will soon come into general availability such as .dev and .page are likely to have a significant impact on the domain world. You can keep track of the extensions they operate at https://www.registry.google/.

Unlike Amazon, or even Apple, Google seem not to have put in use many ngTLDs for redirection purposes.

Google do have their own brand as an extension .google. As noted  earlier, they use that for information on the extensions they offer.  They also make use of it for a corporate blog, as a launch site for finding and registering domain names,  and for their artificial intelligence site.



Facebook


I like what Facebook does using the .design ngTLD.  At Facebook.design you find a set of articles and videos by members of the Facebook design team. They have also have a set of resources for technology designers who are writing code to interact with Facebook.  They even have a link for those who want to apply for a position in design at Facebook. Amazon also uses a .design extension, in a similar mode, but it is a pretty sparse site compared to the Facebook one.


Netflix


As far as I could tell, Netflix make limited use of new domain extensions.  However they do use the .film extension, although it simply redirects to their main Netflix site for your country.  They could have very effectively used different extensions to point to collated resources in different topics, as Amazon does.  Of course Netflix have their own branded ngTLD, although so far the use is limited.


Discussion


I don't see any of these companies ever abandoning their .com (and multiple country redirects) and  going to only a new domain extension.  I do expect they, and other companies, will increasingly use the new domain extensions in catchy domain name phrase marketing.  I hope that more will adopt creative use of multiple extensions along the Amazon line, or do something effective in highlighting a branch of their operation as Facebook do with the .design extension.

Sometimes casual domain observers look only at the main site, and assume that the business is not using new domain extensions.  As this has demonstrated, most large companies own and  use hundreds or thousands of domains.  The use of new extensions in certain niches of their operation is very common among the biggest technology companies.  Com may well be king, but the royal court has a lot of minor players making things varied and interesting!

Please add to comments interesting new extension use by the technology giants that I left out!


Links:


Original post Sept 22, 2018.
Slight revision Oct 3, 2018 to give information re Netflix brand ngTLD, and the dispute with respect to .amazon.

Disclosure:  I currently hold a number of  ngTLD domain names. I am  not associated  (except as a customer) with any of the technology companies named in this report.  The icons of those companies are registered trademarks by them.

Fine Print

This post is offered for informational and educational purposes only, and should not be considered domain name investment advice. While an attempt has been made to be accurate, there is no implied or explicit warranty, and you are responsible for verifying any information of importance to you. You also accept full responsibility for any domain investing decisions you may make.

I try to be fair, balanced and objective in my analysis.  If you feel this post does not meet that standard, please express your concerns to me. 

In a very few cases there may be affiliate links on this blog. This means I receive a small amount if users visit or make purchases via the link. You do not pay any additional charge due to using an affiliate link, and in some cases your cost will be below the normal price. I receive no identifying information about who clicks, or does not click, any link. I never accept compensation to provide favourable review of any particular service or product.

The text of this posting is ©R Hawkes 2018, all rights reserved. However, you may, without permission, use reasonable length portions of the post as long as a link to this post is also provided. If you wish to use the complete contents of a post, please request permission. I am normally open to reprinting, but will consider each request individually. 

Saturday, August 4, 2018

Which Extensions Are Growing in Actual Use?

 Ultimately a domain extension will only be successful it it gains, and maintains, actual real world use.  Yes, an extension can get attention through land rush adoptions and early registration momentum, but if a significant  fraction of those domain names don't actually get used, the extension will lose value.  In this post I take a look at both levels of use and trends for different top level domain (TLD) extensions.

The Data


For this analysis I used data from W3Techs.  If you have not used their site, I urge you to give it a try. They provide a wealth of frequently updated statistical data. In our case we are going to look at their data regarding use of different extensions in actual websites - the direct link to the TLD annual table I used for this post is here.  I outline their methodology in the next paragraph.

They start with the top 10 M websites using Alexa data. The Alexa database has critics, but is probably the most widely used source for site popularity.  The W3Techs.com site aggregates any subdomains into a single combined number (e.g. all of the Blogger sites would be added to have one large use number for blogger.com, and would count as a single website).  As a result, they actually start with a number of sites somewhat less than ten million. W3Techs.com do not include redirected traffic in their data. The analysts at W3Tech compute a three month rolling average for the numbers that are reported here, although the data is updated daily. You can read about their methodology at this link.  One final point with respect to their methodology, prior to 2013 they used the Alexa 1M rather than the Alexa 10M as their starting point.  This may cause some bias when comparing statistics over the years.

COM is King (but trending down)


The first thing obvious from the data is the huge dominance of one extension, .com. It accounts for roughly half of all significant websites. The table below shows percentages for the main extensions, .com, .net, .org, .info, a few other global extensions, including some of the more popular country codes.  To a large degree, any particular other extension is almost lost in the noise.

Website use by different extensions.  Data from W3Techs.com. Consult website for up to date data.


While the data clearly shows that while .com remains dominant, the trend is definitely downward.  Website use of .com peaked in 2011 at about 55.2% of websites. As I write this in early August 2018 it is at about 46.5% use.  While the new global top level domain (ngTLD) introductions may have hastened the decline, it clearly started prior to the new extension introductions.

Challenging Times for NET and INFO 


There has been frequent discussion on NamePros forums about .net and .info struggling in sales numbers and price levels. NameBio data support this, although the change is not dramatic as some domain investors believe.  The extensions .net and.info are also struggling in web use. The .info extension actually peaked in web use in 2011 at about 2.0%. It is currently at 0.9% use.

For .net it was highest in the first year shown in the W3Techs data table, 2010, when it had 6.8% use.  Now it is down to just 3.9% use. It is interesting that the decline of both .net and .info preceded the introduction of the ngTLDs. The introduction of the ngTLDs may well have weakened the use of .net and.info, but they did not start the decline in either extension.

Things Are Good in ORG


The one major global extension that is doing well over the 8 year period is .org, which went from 4.6% in 2010 to 5.1% use currently. The extension has recently got a lot of use by blockchain and cryptocurrency related companies and organizations, but it is not just that factor that has sparked the increase in use of .org, as the extension has increased fairly consistently over the whole period.

Not Great for BIZ


The one extension that seemed most directly impacted by the ngTLD introductions was .biz. Use of the domain name extension peaked around the time of the first big ngTLD introductions and has continued to drop in use since then including during the past year.  At time of writing it represented about 0.27% of web use, still more than even the highest of the new extensions covered in the next section. However, the trend for .biz is definitely negative, and it was at almost 0.40% in global use just a year ago.

New Extensions Well Down List


Even the highest of the ngTLDs are well down the list, with .xyz having about 0.18% use. The trend for .xyz is largely constant since shortly after introduction. Other extensions including .club (0.15%), .online (0.12%), .site (0.07%),  .top (0.08%), and .win (0.05%) make the list but again with modest website use. Most are, however, showing an upward trend (e.g., the .win extension has grown by almost a factor of 4x in website use during the last year - see the graph below).
Data provided  by W3Techs.com. Consult their website for most current data.

An optimist would point to a slight increase in ngTLD use in actual websites, at least taken as a group. A pessimist would say many of the new extensions have now been around for three years and  in total or individually they are still down around the noise in actual website use.

Incidentally, one nice feature of the W3Techs is that you can get additional data on any particular extension. For example, at this link for .xyz you see a temporal plot of its use. Another plot shows how it compares to some other extensions in amount of use and in how popular the sites are that do use the extension.   It also gives you the names of some of the more popular sites using the extension, as well as a random selection of other active sites using the extension.

What about IO?


You can use the W3Techs.com site to study other TLDs.  For example, .io has shown steady growth over the last year, although it still only accounts for about 0.28% of web use in significant sites. The .io extension is much more important in domain name sales than it is, yet, in actual website use.  It is significant, though, that while total use of .io is fairly low compared to the legacy extensions, when it is used, the websites tend  to have higher traffic sites than .net, .com or .org.
The .io TLD is used in fewer websites than the legacy extensions, but when it is used the site tends to be more popular. Consult W3Techs.com for most recent data. 

The Long Term View


At current trends, I project that by about the year 2290 .com and .xyz (and actually a number of other new extensions) will have approximately equal website use! We ngTLD investors better take a long term view or find a profitable niche!

Conclusions


I summarize what I regard as the key takeaways from this analysis below. Keep in mind that the reference set is the 10 million most popular websites in the world (from a total of about 1.9 billion global websites currently). This is a snapshot in time, and you should consult W3Techs.com for the for the most current statistics.

  1. The .com TLD dominates actual web use, with about 46.5% of total use.
  2. While remaining dominant, the percentage of websites that use .com has been trending downward since 2011, with a decline of about 0.17% per year on average.
  3. The .net and .info extensions have been falling in use for a number of years.  In both cases the decline began prior to the ngTLD introductions.
  4. The .org TLD has been growing in popularity over the past decade in website use, and is now at about 5% of global website use. 
  5. The .biz extension seems most strongly hurt by the ngTLD introductions, with a drop from about 0.9% in 2014 to less than 0.3% currently. Several of the ngTLDs will probably pass it in use during the coming 12 months.  
  6. Most of the other places in the top 25 TLDs by use is taken by country code extensions, some of which are trending up and some down.
  7. The new extensions are all well down the list in website use, although most are trending upward. For example use of .win has grown 4x during the past year, well above its growth in registration numbers over the same period.
  8. The most used of the ngTLDs are currently .xyz (0.18%), .club (0.15%), .online (0.12%), .site (0.07%),  .top (0.08%), and .win (0.05%). 
Some domain name investors argue that sales data is all that matters.  I respectfully disagree.  Good prices will not be established or maintained if there is not significant use of a domain extension.  By looking at the trends in TLD use in actual websites, it may be be possible to predict which domains will increase in value, and therefore which warrant maintaining. This analysis suggests that .io and .org both fall in this category.   

Original post Aug 4, 2018.
Minor edit Aug 4, 2018. Missing .xyz data added in point 8 of conclusions.

Links:

Fine Print

This post is offered for informational and educational purposes only, and should not be considered domain name investment advice. While an attempt has been made to be accurate, there is no implied or explicit warranty, and you are responsible for verifying any information of importance to you.

In a few cases there may be affiliate links will on this blog. This means I receive a small amount if users visit or make purchases via the link. You do not pay any additional charge due to using an affiliate link, and in some cases below the normal price. I receive no identifying information about who clicks, or does not click, any link. I never accept compensation to provide favourable review of any particular service or product.

I try to be fair, balanced and objective in my analysis.  If you feel this post does not meet that standard, please express your concerns to me.  As disclosure, I do have a domain portfolio that is predominantly ngTLD domain names, although I do also own a number of .com, .ca, .co and a few other country code extension domains..

The text of this posting is ©R.L. Hawkes, all rights reserved. However, you may, without permission, use reasonable length portions of the post as long as a link to this post is also provided. If you wish to use the complete contents of a post, please request permission. I am normally open to reprinting, but will consider each request individually. 

The images used are either those associated with a product or service, or Pixabay images believed to be available for use without attribution. If you see any image that you believe is problematic, please let us know and we will immediately correct the situation.

Featured Posts

Why Would Anyone Want a New Extension Domain Name?

Background A NamePros user asked this question: "Why (would) an end-user would want to invest in a ngTLD versus a .com domain nam...